Strategic Perception Inc.

Unusual thoughts that win

  • Our Work
    • Politics
    • Corporate
    • Public Affairs
  • Awards
    • Telly Awards
    • Pollie Awards
  • People
    • Fred Davis
    • Strategic People
  • Highlight Reel
  • Get In Touch

September 24, 2018 by admin Leave a Comment

NASHVILLE – Lingering rock music played from the speakers of the fading election night party of Republican gubernatorial nominee Bill Lee on Thursday night as a crowd of supporters congratulated the candidate on his primary victory.

Most were enthused — all were optimistic — but some were still a bit shocked.

“This is, well, amazing,” one person told a Lee campaign spokesperson he pulled aside before disappearing back into the crowd. “No man, I mean it, amazing.”

The surprise of the night came not only from Lee’s victory, but especially the margin, leaving many to wonder how it came to be.

But as the the race turned negative, many, including the candidates, say it was Lee’s positive, faith-based message that resonated with voters.

A surprising margin

Lee beat out his nearest contender, former economic development commissioner Randy Boyd, 37 percent to 24 percent, followed by U.S. Rep. Diane Black at 23 percent and House Speaker Beth Harwell at 15 percent.

In May 2017, near the beginning of the campaign, Black led the candidates in name recognition, with 49 percent of registered voters knowing of her, according to a Vanderbilt University poll.

Just 14 percent of those polled recognized Lee.

With sizable name recognition and a conservative voting record, Black was the apparent front-runner.

Meanwhile, Boyd played a prominent role in Gov. Bill Haslam’s administration as a commissioner bringing in business to the state and helping to develop Haslam’s popular Tennessee Promise initiative to fund free community college. Boyd was a close second in name recognition last year.

Boyd and Black shared a lead in the polls in the early months — some showing an advantage of 15 points or more between themselves and Lee.

Then came the money.

In the most expensive governor’s race in Tennessee history, Boyd spent $21.07 million, Black spent $13.83 million and Lee spent $7.05 million.

So how did Lee, owner of Williamson County-based Lee Company — a heating, air, plumbing and electrical company — best Black and Boyd?

Analysts have looked to the increasingly negative tone of the race toward its latter days for answers. As attack ads first flew between the Black and Boyd campaigns, Lee abstained.

But as Lee rose in the polls ads targeting him went on the air. The Black campaign criticized him for donating to former Nashville Mayor Megan Barry, what Lee later called a business decision. The Black campaign also accused the Lee Company of mistreating veterans because of a lawsuit from a veteran and former employee.

Boyd attacked Lee in an ad saying Lee was once president of the Associated Builders and Contractors, which recommended permanent residence for undocumented immigrants who had demonstrated a positive work history. But Lee was president before the recommendation.

Lee decided not to launch his own attack ads in response.

“Our campaign is having a real surge in momentum, and it’s evidenced by I’m the only candidate actually being attacked by everyone,” Lee said July 18 when he went to vote early in Williamson County.

“And so that shows that we have momentum and people are believing the message and understanding my vision.

“Deceptive attack ads, to me, it’s everything that’s wrong with politics,” Lee said. “I’m not going to go there. It’s not who I am.”

In fact, it was shortly after the attack ads aired that Lee’s rise in polls became more pronounced, indicating voters’ own negative reactions.

“I saw all the backstabbing accusations,” said Dolores Mackey, 70, a Mt. Juliet resident and a supporter of Harwell. “I’m just sick of it.”

Longtime Republican strategist Tom Ingram successfully ran political campaigns for U.S. Sen. Fred Thompson, Gov. Don Sundquist, U.S. Sen. Bob Corker and Haslam. He said he had never seen a race tighten up like this one.

Ingram said the race began to change slowly, then things began to “come unglued” for Boyd when he started running attack ads against Black and Lee.

“You’ve always had to be careful with negative advertising because it usually drags up the attacker’s negatives and you hope it drives up the target’s negatives more,” he said.

Harwell’s poll numbers were thought to have risen leading up to the primary for this reason as well.

Through this gap, Lee found a path to victory. Lee refused to go negative and steered clear of other fights that could have pushed him off message.

Even Black campaign spokesman Chris Hartline gave Lee a nod for staying disciplined.

“Some of (Black’s) opponents and the outside groups started attacking Diane early. There was a, you know, regular onslaught pretty much from the beginning against her,” Hartline said. “And, you know, Bill Lee found a way to kind of come up through the middle.

“You gotta give kudos to him for figuring out that strategy and getting it done at the end of the day,” Hartline said.

Faith, personal story became cornerstone of campaign

Lee’s television ads touched on many of the same topics his rivals did: immigration, the Second Amendment and social issues, such as abortion.

In Lee’s town hall speeches, he focused on issues closer to home — jobs in rural communities, education reform directed toward training more skilled labor and even prison reform to better re-entry after prison.

But by far, the cornerstone of his campaign was Lee’s own personal story that he told at every town hall and forum across the state — his personal tragedy in the death of his first wife of 16 years, Carol Ann, and how it drew him closer to God.

“My faith is the most important thing in my life, and that won’t change when I’m the governor,” he said in one ad, set in front of the South Harpeth Church of Christ where Lee attended as a child.

“In recent times, too often the voice of the faithful has been made to feel increasingly unwelcome in the public square, and that’s a mistake,” he said. “The phrase ‘separation of church and state’ has been twisted. It was intended to keep the government out of church, but not to keep people of faith out of the government.”

He said the governor’s office is a “calling.”

Even some of Lee’s most high-profile supporters have deep connections to the faith community. Notable names include Christian music recording artist Michael W. Smith, for instance.

As Lee’s success rose, the other campaigns noticed.

Boyd’s ads mellowed in the final days of the campaign, somewhat mirroring Lee’s.

One named “Cut the Noise” depicted Boyd with a calm voice.

“It’s time to cut the noise and get to what’s important,” Boyd said in the ad. “It’s in the quiet stillness of the day I pray, I seek God’s wisdom and I listen.”

In the end, it was too late.

In the days leading up to the August primary, polls showed Lee with a pronounced lead, rallies were drawing hundreds, and many had bought into Lee’s closest connection to them, their faith.

Brent Leatherwood, the former executive director of the Tennessee Republican Party and now strategic partnerships director for the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, said Lee’s faith is a “big part of his life.”

“That very well could have registered as authentic to Tennesseans and been a factor for them in deciding who to support,” Leatherwood said.

“More broadly, though, Lee ran a positive campaign, refused to go negative when everything suggested he should, and he was able to harness the enthusiasm voters had and turn it into votes,” Leatherwood said. “Clearly, running a campaign like that spoke to not only evangelicals but Tennesseans of all backgrounds.”

When election results arrived at the Lee campaign election party at The Factory at Franklin on Thursday night, supporters said their prayers had been answered.

September 24, 2018 by admin Leave a Comment

CHATTANOOGA – By the time they shifted attention to him, Bill Lee was ready.

In early July, after focusing on presumed front-runner Randy Boyd for months, U.S. Rep. Diane Black cut an attack ad against Lee. The gist? He donated money to Democratic politicians.

A couple weeks later, Boyd also moved the focus of his attacks to Lee. He said Lee was associated with a group that once pushed for immigration reform. Also, he donated to Democrats. Also, maybe he doesn’t actually support President Donald Trump.
On July 10, Lee released a response.

“All these dishonest attack ads,” he said, over soft piano. “They’re a great example of what’s wrong with politics. I’m not going down that road. It’s not who I am. It’s not what a leader does. I think those ads reveal a lot more truth about the person running the ad than the person in the ad. A person willing to deceive, say anything, do anything to get elected: Is that who you want as governor?”

It was a great response, Vanderbilt University political science professor John Geer said. In effect, Lee cut a negative ad, criticizing his opponents. But he did so in a way that appeared dignified, as if he was shaking his head at a fight in the sewer — err, swamp.

On Thursday, Lee won the four-candidate Republican governor’s primary with 36.7 percent of the vote. Lee faces Democrat and former Nashville Mayor Karl Dean in the Nov. 6 general election.

“Lee was using a stiletto and not a meat ax,” Geer said. “And the Republican primary voters like a stiletto much more than a meat ax.”

When he launched his campaign, Lee was relatively unknown across the state. He had no political experience. He ran a big company based in Nashville, but he wasn’t a celebrity businessman, like Trump. For most of the race, it put him behind Black and Boyd, the state’s former economic and community development director.

Lee’s team used it to his advantage.

“They’re not going to know him early,” said Fred Davis III, Lee’s media consultant. “We couldn’t compete. But we knew we had the best candidate, the best person, the best heart. We knew that he would grow well on people. There’s only one day you win or lose. That was [Thursday]. It wasn’t Jan. 1. It wasn’t March 15.”

With Black and Boyd the early favorites, Lee’s team stayed out of the fray while the two front runners fired shots. In an October press release, Black said Boyd was not a sufficient Republican. She wrote that Boyd, an avid runner, boasted a conservative record “as short as his shorts.”

In May, a PAC funded by a Boyd supporter shot back: Black was actually the one who was not a sufficient Republican. The ad highlighted a vote 17 years ago in the state legislature, when Black supported a law allowing undocumented immigrants to get driver’s licenses.

Black then said Boyd had previously disavowed Trump and once pushed for tax increases. Boyd called Black “D.C. Diane” and showed her in a swamp and doing an interview with “LIBERAL REPORTER” Katie Couric.

By contrast, Lee’s ads were soothing. They showed him walking through his family farm in Williamson County, wearing jeans and plaid button-downs. They showed him at his company and the church where he grew up, too. He didn’t mention Black. He didn’t mention Boyd. He didn’t mention the fourth candidate, Tennessee Speaker of the House Beth Harwell.

In his first TV ad, released in January, he talked about the death of his first wife, how it made him a stronger Christian who wanted to dedicate his life to helping others. Later, he talked about the need to support farmers and quoted Jesus. (Adding another layer: The background music of most of his ads was “Carol Ann,” a song written 18 years ago in honor of his late wife by Christian artist Michael W. Smith, a friend of Lee’s.)

According to a Vanderbilt University poll in early May, Lee had the lowest name recognition of the four candidates. But among those who knew him, his favorabilities were the highest. His unfavorabilities were the lowest.

His campaign team spent about $7 million, compared to $21 million for Boyd and $14 million for Black. Lee’s team made its ad push in the final months of the race.

“We wanted to get Bill on the playing field early,” Davis said of the January ad. “Then we went dark for a long, long, long time, while our competitors were on the air. It wasn’t like we had a choice. Bill told us what the budget would be.”

Davis, a veteran conservative media consultant, said he met with Lee about 1 1/2 years ago, in an upstairs, private dining room at Jimmy Kelly’s Steakhouse in Nashville. Lee was not his first choice. He had previously been rejected by Boyd, but he still wanted skin in the Tennessee governor’s race. Lee seemed nice, and he believed in his story with conviction. Davis saw potential.

The addition of Davis was the first sign Lee was a threat in the Republican field, Geer said. He believes Davis is “one of the best media people in the country,” with experience working on presidential campaigns for George W. Bush and John McCain.

“Boyd would have had a much better campaign had he had Fred Davis,” Geer said.

But Lee’s advertisements are a stark contrast from Davis’ specialty. He is famously absurdist, known to take a slight quirk and blow it up. He wants spots that will drop jaws and — sometimes — outrage people. Crazy ads are more economically efficient than traditional ones. When you run a crazy ad, it becomes a news story. Journalists spread your message for free.

His first famous ad was a 1994 spot, in which he poked fun at some Bill Clinton legislation. A small, overlooked piece of the proposed law would fund dancing classes for convicts. So, Davis hired burly men, dressed them in pink Tutus and filmed them twirling in a studio.

In 2002, he helped Sonny Perdue unseat incumbent Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes with a short film of a Godzilla-sized rat plodding over downtown Atlanta in a crown. A voiceover actor proclaimed him “King Roy.” Later, Davis directed an ad of Christine O’Donnell announcing to the camera, “I’m not a witch.” Also, an ad depicting a political opponent as a demon dressed a sheep.

At times, critics have said his messages are dog whistling, a charge Davis denies. A 2012 ad attacking Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow attempted to portray her as reckless with taxpayer money. It showed an Asian woman riding a bicycle through a rice paddy.

“Debbie spend so much American money, you borrow more and more from us,” the woman said. “Your economy get very weak. Ours get very good. We take your jobs.”

Amid complaints, Davis’ client, a Republican candidate, pulled the ad from his website.

About three months later, in May 2012, an anti-Obama ad proposal authored by Davis leaked to the New York Times. The document was titled “The Defeat of Barack Hussein Obama,” referred to the president as a “metrosexual black Abe Lincoln” and argued that the Republican candidate needed to tie Obama to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, something he believed Sen. John McCain failed to do in 2008. (Davis, who worked for McCain during the 2008 race, described him as a “crusty old politician who often seemed confused” in the leaked document.)

Over the past year, though, Davis said he took cues from Lee. But he added that Lee was in the right position, with the two leading candidates at each other’s throats early. Zach Wamp, a former congressman who endorsed Lee, agreed that negative ads are more effective in a two-candidate field.

“The smart strategy is to stay completely away from it,” he said. “Run straight ahead positively. Bill Lee executed it to perfection.”

For Wamp and his son, Weston, this governor’s race felt personal. Boyd’s campaign manager, Chip Saltsman, worked for Rep. Chuck Fleischmann in his races against Weston Wamp. During the 2014 campaign, a mailer paid for by Chuck Fleischmann for Congress Committee showed Weston Wamp, edited to be burning a passport.

Weston Wamp said Saltsman’s campaign used other tactics, like splicing his words and taking them out of context. During an interview with the Times Free Press on Friday, he said he felt energized by the positively of Lee’s campaign. He also cut a video in support of Lee on his Facebook page, which featured him almost crying at times and garnered 25,000 views.

Nationally, Saltsman is best known for an unsuccessful bid for Republican National Committee chairman, which flamed out in December 2008 when he distributed a CD featuring the song “Barack the Magical Negro.” (Saltsman told CNN at the time the song was political satire.)

“He’s a dirty actor,” Zach Wamp said. “And frankly, it was a $25 million mistake Randy Boyd made of hiring a dirty actor. That’s the bottom line. Frankly, a guy who rose to prominence of running dirty, unethical campaigns, and it caught up with him. Finally.” Saltsman did not return a request for comment.

Davis added that Tennessee voters tend to disparage attack ads more than other state he works in. He doesn’t have any scientific proof for this. But, compared to his more outlandish pieces, Davis’ work here tends to take on a different theme. He sells nostalgia and depicts the candidate as a quiet, humble leader, feeling a burden to improve the world.

Take his ads for Bill Haslam. Davis filmed a spot in the cafeteria where Haslam, a billionaire, worked as a kid. (“I just like him,” his former boss.) Another ad showed Haslam walking alone through a field, his sleeves rolled up.

For Bob Corker’s 2006 senate campaign, Davis depicted the candidate as a small business owner, made good. Like in one of Lee’s ads, Corker talked about his work on a missions trip. Davis framed his opponent, Harold Ford Jr., as an elitist who didn’t care about the good people of Tennessee.

“I may not be as good lookin’,” Corker, a millionaire, said in one ad. “I may not be as articulate. And I may not be able to do those slick commercials. But what I can do is solve problems. That’s what I’ve been doing all my life. That’s why I get up in the morning.”

Lee’s press secretary, Chris Burger, declined to comment Friday on when internal polls showed Lee was ahead in the race. But Geer said the answer was obvious: once Black and Boyd started criticizing him. By then, they bruised themselves too much.

“People want some sort of positive message,” he said. “There really wasn’t much of one.”

September 24, 2018 by admin Leave a Comment

NASHVILLE – Republican gubernatorial Bill Lee’s campaign says it is preparing to launch a statewide television ad buy as Tennessee’s 2018 GOP gubernatorial primary enters its next phase.

The campaign wouldn’t reveal how much it plans to spend on running the ad, entitled “Why,” which officials say will begin airing Saturday and run through Feb. 3.

As of early Friday afternoon, a review of public filings for Tennessee televisions on the Federal Communication Commission’s website showed the Williamson County businessman’s campaign had only reserved $35,390 in air time. That was for one Nashville television station.

But Lee campaign spokesman Chris Walker said it is indeed a statewide campaign buy from the millionaire businessman. It would make it the first of many television ads Tennessee voters will see in coming months with a six-person GOP primary field and two Democrats running in the Aug. 2 primary.

It was produced by consultants including national GOP strategist and media Fred Davis, who is known for his sometimes unconventional approach to political advertising. The ad is a highly personal biographical introduction to Lee, a first-time candidate whose name identification is low according to polling, and what led the businessman on the path to run for governor.

“We believe it is important that voters know Bill’s personal story and what shaped him,” said Chris Devaney, Bill Lee’s campaign manager, in a news release. “This ad gives a real look at who Bill is.”

The 60-second spot begins with a scene capturing a misty morning on the Lee family farm as the candidate describes a defining moment of his life, the death of his first wife, Carol Ann Lee, from a horse riding accident.

“We cried, we mourned, we struggled, we prayed, we healed, we started laughing again,” says Lee. “Everything changed.”

Lee, who later remarried, said he threw himself into his home and building services company to make it “the best place to work for 1,200 hard-working plumbers, pipefitters and electricians.

“Can I make life better for every person in this state? I believe I can,” Lee says. “I’m sure going to try.”

As he speaks, subtitles slowly appear, describing Lee’s volunteer work as a board member of the Tennessee Higher Education Commission, Hope Clinic for Women, Men of Valor Prison Ministry and, finally, “Conservative Republican For Governor.”

Other Republicans in the contest include former state Sen. Mae Beavers, R-Mt. Juliet; U.S. Rep. Diane Black of Gallatin; Knoxville businessman and former state economic commissioner Randy Boyd; Tennessee House Speaker Beth Harwell and Johnson City Realtor Kay White.

Major Democrats running are former Nashville Mayor Karl Dean and state House Minority Leader Craig Fitzhugh of Ripley.

April 29, 2017 by admin Leave a Comment

OHIO GOVERNOR JOHN KASICH ANNOUNCES HIS PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN ON JULY 21, 2015, IN COLUMBUS, OHIO. TY WRIGHT/GETTY IMAGES

New Day for America plans to spend big on the ad in New Hampshire in the coming weeks.

The super-PAC supporting Ohio Governor John Kasich’s campaign for president is invoking Donald Trump’s iconic helicopter in a new TV commercial that will target New Hampshire voters this week.

New Day for America, which boosted Republican Kasich’s standing in polls in the critical first-in-the-nation primary state of New Hampshire with a previous flight of television ads that started in early July, hopes to keep his momentum going with a new, cheeky ad that implicitly compares Kasich’s record of government accomplishment with Trump’s boasts.

The ad, obtained by Bloomberg Politics, begins with a close up on helicopter blades. “He’s turned red ink to black,” a deep, narrator’s voice says as the rotor starts turning and the aircraft makes a slow ascent. “Shattered expectations. Experience. Success. Speaks to every one of us. Blunt. Direct. Not part of the tired system.”

As captions at the bottom of the screen display Kasich’s jobs, tax and budget record as a public official, the narrator continues: “Best of all, he’s done great things. Not for himself, but for us.”

Only then is Kasich’s name, emblazoned in red on the side of the helicopter, revealed.

Unlike almost every other candidate in the Republican race, Kasich has avoided tangling with Trump, who has regularly traded fire with other hopefuls, such as Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Carly Fiorina, and Scott Walker. As fellow Republicans sparred with The Donald on the debate stage last week, Kasich instead urged civility. “If I were sitting at home and watch thing back and forth, I would be inclined to turn it off,” he warned, encouraging his party to focus on policy issues instead of infighting.

Now the governor’s super-PAC’s efforts have the potential to change that dynamic, albeit with a lighthearted touch.

The admaker who produced the commercial for the super-PAC, Fred Davis, is known for his attention-getting videos. In this case, although Trump is never mentioned or shown, the intention is clear—to spoof the lifestyle of Trump, who brought his branded helicopter to the Iowa State Fair this summer, and make the case that Kasich has similar straight-talking qualities but with a record of accomplishment that the billionaire lacks.

Another possible part of the gambit: although Kasich has moved up in New Hampshire polling, he still has a long way to get both in that state and nationally to raise his name ID, and slapping his last name on the side of a helicopter is sure to garner at least some attention.

And the core message of the ad, listing Kasich’s accomplishments as a congressman and now as governor, echoes the candidate’s own emphasis, which directly challenges the political success of Trump, Dr. Ben Carson, and the field’s current momentum candidate, businesswoman Fiorina, none of whom have held elective office.

According to a source familiar with the super-PAC’s plans, New Day for America intends to spend about $228,000 per week for the next two weeks at least airing the spot on New Hampshire broadcast and cable TV channels, as well on Boston broadcast TV stations that reach the Granite State.‎ To date, the super-PAC has spent more than $5.7 million on New Hampshire and Boston media to boost Kasich.

In the last few rounds of public polling in New Hampshire, Kasich hovers around 10 percent, and he is now competing with Bush and Fiorina for a third-place spot behind Trump and Carson. Nationally, even after two debate performances that have earned strong reviews, Kasich still lags well behind the front-runners.

Although the super-PAC’s first flight of ads helped boost Kasich in New Hampshire (along with frequent campaign trips there and several high-profile endorsements), the airwaves are more crowded now, as other campaigns and super-PACS begin to advertise, as well. New Day for America has spent millions on commercials targeting New Hampshire voters, staying on the air continuously from the day they began their advertising.

Read the original story at Bloomberg Politics.

April 28, 2017 by admin Leave a Comment


December 6, 2016 by admin Leave a Comment

Rivals are sharpening their knives for traditional media consultants after a cycle that saw the winning presidential campaign weather an onslaught of TV ads without even coming close to parity with its own.

The conventional wisdom of television has long been that it needs to be countered point for point otherwise the campaign with the deficit risks certain defeat.

Like most conventional wisdom, that didn’t apply in 2016. Many in the industry believe that this cycle was an anomaly unlikely to be repeated. There’s only one Donald Trump, is a common refrain.

But those in the digital world argue 2016 was a turning point toward the more targeted media they offer. In fact, instead of launching the era of Big Data, as 2012 did, this cycle may become famous for triggering the end of Big TV.

“Traditional media consultants should learn a lot from this election,” said Keegan Goudiss, a partner at Revolution Messaging who served as director of digital advertising for Bernie 2016.

“TV advertising will remain an important tactic in 2018, but its influence wanes each year as voters become harder and harder to reach via TV.

“The Republicans clearly showed that focusing more efforts on broader, targeted digital ads with a final push of TV at the end is more effective than the strategy employed by Democrats.”

Goudiss argued that those who continue to believe that a focus on TV advertising will bring a campaign victory are “dangerous and arrogant.”

“Arrogance was not a successful strategy in 2016,” he said. “We need to evolve our advertising tactics to win.”

New Landscape, Same Challenges

Now, even traditional media consultants will admit the landscape has changed. For evidence, they look no further than the president-elect’s still-active Twitter feed, which Trump singled out, along with his other social media channels, as the tool that helped get him elected.

Digital communications consultants wholeheartedly agree, and say that’s the path forward.

“[H]e picked media that he could dominate,” Jerry Cave, a digital media consultant who ran unsuccessfully for state Senate as a Republican in Maryland in 2010, recently told The Atlantic. “The media that all these stupid Republicans always pick and the one that Hillary was all prepared for is paid television advertising. Well, there’s a lot of things wrong with that. Number one, people can tune it out mentally. Number two, they tune it out digitally. Number three, it’s not credible.”

Undoubtedly, the Clinton campaign dominated paid TV advertising. Of the approximately 500,000 political TV ads that aired between June 12-Nov. 6 targeting the presidential race, the Clinton campaign and its allied groups accounted for 75 percent, according to a Center for Public Integrity analysis, based on data from Kantar Media/CMAG. Moreover, ads aired by the campaigns directly were just as lopsided: 282,159 for Clinton to 84,840 for Trump.

Asked about what industry lessons could be learned from that barrage, one of Clinton’s media consultants declined to comment to C&E citing a non-disclosure agreement. Jim Margolis, whose firm GMMB, did the media buying and produced ads for Clinton wasn’t available to comment for this story.

Without those inside the campaign sharing details about their media strategy, it will be impossible for the industry to weigh whether anything the Clinton camp did was effective, according to Neil Williams, a media buyer who works with Republican campaigns.

“If you see a spot in a program you would not otherwise see it in, is it there because something or somebody told them it was a great program to be in? [Is] it there because it was a make-good due to a slammed market? Or is it there because you need to buy 2000 GRPs?,” he asked. “As outsiders, we will never know this.”

One thing traditional media consultants do know is that they’re not changing the way they do things because of how 2016 shook down. At least not yet.

Fred Davis, a GOP media consultant, pointed to his work for Louisiana Senate candidate John Kennedy, who faces a Dec. 10 runoff vote against Democrat Foster Campbell.

“Did we change one single tactic based on Donald Trump?” asked Davis. “No, we didn’t.”

Davis noted that other celebrity candidates haven’t been able to avoid spending on TV as Trump did. “I worked for Arnold Schwarzenegger [when he ran for reelection in California in 2006.] We still spent $95 million on TV because it was necessary to win.”

Clinton’s TV strategy wasn’t an indictment of media consulting in general, he added. “She ran a very traditional campaign and [produced] very traditional ads in the most non-traditional time. Voters hated everything about D.C. Of all the people, Donald Trump was there at the right place, at the right time.”

Confident About The Future

Casey Phillips, a GOP media consultant, said his business has continued to grow despite increased competition from digitally focused shops. “Our company continues to double in size every year. We produced nearly 400 ads this year. There’s an insatiable need for content,” he said.

He dismissed the idea that 2016 marked the end of TV advertising’s dominance. “Some of the dollars are going to shift to wherever people are consuming media,” he said. “But if you don’t think TV ads make a difference in Senate, House and governors’ races, you’re looking at the wrong set of data.”

To wit, Phillips agreed with Davis that 2016 wouldn’t rewrite the media consultants’ playbook. “I don’t know anyone who’s going to put the breaks on advertising on issues they believe in, or for candidates they believe in.”

But donors are again venting their frustration at what they see as money poorly spent. “I may very well be done with political giving entirely,” Florida attorney John Morgan, a Clinton fundraiser, recently told The Hill. “I’d much rather give money to build a new Boys & Girls Club than to give to the [Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee].”

The Democratic side’s anger hasn’t centered on a single consultant the way it did during the GOP presidential primary when Mike Murphy was criticized for making multi-million dollar commissions off a Jeb Bush-allied Super PAC’s $100 million spend. In 2012, Karl Rove faced similar blowback after his groups, American Crossroads and Crossroads GPS, blew through some $300 million, but failed to derail President Obama’s reelection bid.

Part of the reason why Democratic consultants haven’t been put on the rack the same way their GOP colleagues were is that many in the industry agree that Clinton herself should shoulder some of the blame.

“She was not a great messenger; not the right person for a change environment,” said John Rowley, a Democratic media consultant. “The stuff that was positive for her, really felt more packaged than what some other campaigns had done. It was authentic to who she was, but it didn’t really peel away the veneer.”

The biggest lesson from 2016, according to Rowley, isn’t that TV is on the decline. Rather it’s that packaging candidates in slickly produced spots isn’t as effective as it once was.

“We see it in focus groups: people want less slickly produced spots,” he said. “Ad credibility is huge, they want stuff that’s documented. The BS detector for political ads is bigger than ever.

“It’s better to have a credible ad than an ad that the operatives sit around and pat themselves on the back for.”

Rowley added: “I think Obama ushered in a new era of authenticity in politics that every consultant in every medium has to be aware of — and Trump benefited from it.”

April 28, 2016 by admin Leave a Comment

April 18, 2016 by admin Leave a Comment

A leading conservative group is spending $200,000 over the next week to help Rep. Bill Shuster (R-Pa.) beat back a vigorous primary challenge.

The American Action Network says it will spend nearly $150,000 on a TV ad in Shuster’s western Pennsylvania district. In addition, it’s paying for digital advertisements and get-out-the-vote phone calls. The ad touts Shuster’s conservative bona fides, and like the group’s other ads this cycle, does not mention that Shuster is the incumbent.

A typical voter will see the AAN ad at least 10 times before the April 24 primary, based on the group’s spending level.

Shuster, the chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, is facing a vigorous challenge from tea-party backed candidate Art Halvorson. Shuster is clearly taking the race seriously. He has spent $500,000 on TV ads and debated Halvorson on Saturday. Shuster has $1.3 million in the bank, compared to Halvorson’s paltry $31,000.

AAN polled the race in February and again two weeks ago, and both surveys showed Shuster above 50 percent, the group said. But Donald Trump is expected to do well in Shuster’s district, which could help boost Halvorson’s support.

“We did polling in this district and much like the previous primaries we did polling in, Bill Shuster is in strong position to be re-elected,” said Mike Shields, the president of the American Action Network. “We want to make sure. And so that’s why we are going in, to be cautious. We want to ensure we can put him over the top and ensure that he is safe.”

Shuster is a mainstay in the district. He has held the seat since 2001, and his father represented the area from 1973 to 2001. But Halvorson is trying to seize on Shuster’s romantic relationship with Shelley Rubino, a top lobbyist for Airlines for America, the leading trade group representing U.S. airlines.

As chairman of the transportation committee, Shuster has direct oversight over aviation policy. At Saturday’s debate, Halvorson blasted Shuster for “cavorting” with a lobbyist who attempts to influence his committee. Shuster has touted the infrastructure projects he has helped bring to the district, while attempting to portray Halvorson as a carpetbagger.

espite the topsy -turvy political climate, not a single incumbent has lost a primary challenge this year. AAN or its super PAC affiliate, the Congressional Leadership Fund, has spent money on behalf of two other Republican lawmakers this cycle: Kevin Brady in Texas and John Shimkus in Illinois.

Read the original story at Politico.

April 13, 2016 by admin Leave a Comment

THE NEW DAY FOR AMERICA AD ASSERTS THAT JOHN KASICH IS THE ONLY ONE QUALIFIED TO BEAT DEMOCRATIC FRONT-RUNNER HILLARY CLINTON IN A GENERAL ELECTION. AP PHOTO

John Kasich is not a quitter.

That’s the message of a new television ad released in Pennsylvania by New Day for America, a Super PAC supporting the Ohio governor.

“John Kasich was born right here in McKees Rocks, Pennsylvania,” the 30-second spot starts, citing a western Pennsylvania town. “The son of a mailman, he’s fought for everything he’s achieved in life. So when Trump and Cruz whine that Kasich should quit the race, John says: You quit.”

Last month, billionaire businessman Donald Trump released his first attack ad against Kasich ahead of the state’s primary, criticizing his connections to Wall Street during the collapse of Lehman Brothers; Kasich worked as managing director in its investment banking division for a short period of time. Both Trump and Ted Cruz have said at times that Kasich should leave the race.

The New Day for America ad asserts that Kasich is the only one qualified to beat Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton in a general election.

“We don’t quit in Pennsylvania,” it concludes.

According to the latest RealClearPolitics average of polling, Kasich earns 20.5 percent of support among Republicans, compared to Trump and Cruz, who earn 39 and 32.3 percent respectively. Pennsylvania’s primary is April 26.

Read the original story at Politico.

April 8, 2016 by admin Leave a Comment

OHIO GOV. JOHN KASICH IS HOPING TO PICK UP DELEGATES IN NEW YORK’S UPCOMING REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY

A pro-John Kasich super PAC released an ad Friday that suggests Ted Cruz and Donald Trump are mentally unfit to be president.

The commercial — which is from the group New Day for America and is titled “Crazy” — is set to Patsy Cline’s 1961 country song “Crazy.”

It begins by noting that Cruz was once told by his father, Rafael Cruz, that he was anointed by God to serve in a powerful position.

The ad then turns to Trump, highlighting his support for creating a database of Muslims living in the U.S. and his openness to using nuclear weapons against Europe. It also points to Trump’s remarks that, if abortion were to be outlawed, women who receive the procedure should be punished. (Trump later recanted the abortion remarks.)

“Is that the best we can do? No, it’s not,” a voiceover says, before cutting to an image of Kasich, who is described as “stable” and “presidential.”

The ad pivots to Kasich’s message that he’s the most electable remaining GOP candidate, pointing to polling indicating that while Cruz and Trump would struggle against Hillary Clinton, Kasich would fare better.

The commercial is scheduled to run in New York and Pennsylvania as part of a more than $1 million ad buy. The two upcoming primary states are rich with delegates. Kasich, who is trailing in the GOP contest, is making an aggressive push in both states, believing that they fit his moderate approach.

The Kasich super PAC has aired a number of tough ads, including one recently that labeled Cruz “lyin’ Ted.” Kasich distanced himself from the commercial, asking for the super PAC to remove it.

Read the original story at Politico.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 12
  • Next Page »
Unusual thoughts that win
Bolt
link to instagramlink to facebook

COPYRIGHT MMXVIIII STRATEGIC PERCEPTION INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT INFORMATION: ALL MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, TEXT, DATA, GRAPHICS, LOGOS, BUTTON ICONS, IMAGES, AUDIO CLIPS, VIDEO CLIPS, LINKS, DIGITAL DOWNLOADS, DATA COMPILATIONS, AND SOFTWARE IS OWNED, CONTROLLED BY, OR LICENSED TO STRATEGIC PERCEPTION INC. AND IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT, TRADEMARK, AND OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE IS MADE AVAILABLE SOLELY FOR YOUR PERSONAL, NON-COMMERCIAL USE AND MAY NOT BE COPIED, REPRODUCED, REPUBLISHED, MODIFIED, UPLOADED, POSTED, TRANSMITTED, OR DISTRIBUTED IN ANY WAY, INCLUDING BY E-MAIL OR OTHER ELECTRONIC MEANS, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STRATEGIC PERCEPTION INC. IN EACH INSTANCE.